Viable Framework-DPSIR
Acronyms:
DPSIR- Driver, Pressure, State, Impact, Response (DPSIR)
SESF- Socio Ecological Systems Framework (SESF)
SES-Socio Ecological System
I mentioned earlier on in Post 2 that I discounted DPSIR
from the choice of frameworks due to there being no clear delineation of
society and government unlike SESF. What I realised after the previous post on
governance was that it is entirely possible for a SES to be self- governed
without the need for intervention from the government. Thus, DPSIR is entirely
viable as a framework.
At the same time, SESF is rather conceptual in nature whilst
DPSIR put into practise by the European Environment Agency (EEA). Thus DPSIR
may be seen as more comprehensive in practise than SESF. Thus, I cannot just outright
discount DPSIR.
Anyways, on to the main topic for the day, COMPLEX
SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS!
Fort Canning Park (FCP)
![]() |
Souce: YourSingapore |
Palaces? Army Barracks? Wartime Command Centre? Fort Canning
has a rather varied history as one of Singapores iconic hilltops. Located right
behind the National Museum of Singapore, Fort Canning today is a hot favourite
for events and celebrations. It hosts various concerts and festivals and is a
hot favourite for the after-work yoga crowd. I used to run there weekly with the Aquathalon team and there were plenty of runners pounding the running paths at night making FCP quite a hot spot for exercise.
![]() |
NParks |
Why Fort Canning Park?
Well for starters, FCP is unique as it is one of the more
centrally located parks in Singapore that is not just a park but has numerous
other facilities located in it.
First off, Fort Canning was used as the headquarters of the
army that defended Singapore in WW2. The structures used during that period
still exist as an attraction today which adds another socio-dimension to the
ecosystem. Tourists or history buffs may be attracted to visit FCP for the
history attached to the park. Furthermore, maintaining the historical value of
the structures has to be included in any governance plan covering FCP. Thus
increasing the complexity of governance.
![]() |
Source: NParks |
Secondly, the park often hosts large scale events such as
Films at the Fort, Ballet under the Stars and Shakespeare in the Park which
bring a large amount of foot traffic. This question then is whether the
infrastructure of the park; both natural and manmade can withstand the crowds
these events bring. For example, most of the events require visitors to sit on
the greens of the park. Thus the governing body has to be aware of how
resilient the greens are to use to determine how often events can be held.
Things to look out for
Basically, the goal is to discern how the park is being
governed and the direction this governance is going in. For example, the
condition of the historical structures in the park, whether they have any
damage besides the normal wear and tear that comes from time. Especially since
most of the park is connected by running paths which implies that visitors have
easy access to these historical sites.
By direction of governance I meet to what objective park
managers are working towards. Is the park going to focus on maintaining its current
position as a historical site with festivals and events or perhaps moving to
increase its presence as an exercise spot for the office crowd?
That said, ill be heading to FCP to find out!
Sources:
NParks
https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardens-parks-and-nature/parks-and-nature-reserves/fort-canning-park
YourSingapore
http://www.yoursingapore.com/see-do-singapore/nature-wildlife/parks-gardens/fort-canning-park.html
LonelyPlanet
http://www.lonelyplanet.com/singapore/sights/parks-gardens/fort-canning-park
No comments:
Post a Comment